Resources / read, listen, explore

Understand the proposition.
Examine the evidence.

The current overview and evidence page describe today’s development stage. Earlier concept papers and video explain research ideas; they do not establish product performance.

Current overview / September 2026

Listen to the PQS introduction.

A plain-language guide to the proposition, the electrical result, and the next validation step.

Computer-narrated for accessibility. No autoplay.

Read the transcript

Precision becomes valuable when it helps someone make a decision. A stable instrument is a starting point, but holding a setting steady does not always preserve measurement quality. Peterson Quantum Sensing is developing a supervisory software or firmware layer that pays attention to a defined noise or information objective alongside an instrument's existing controls.

The idea is to make small adjustments, observe their effect, and seek favorable measurement conditions. A quieter output still has to preserve the desired signal. Calibration, bias, and response speed matter.

Today, PQS is at the electrical proof-of-principle stage. In one experiment with a deliberately moving optimum, active control reduced the median test objective by 3.68 decibels, about 57 percent, compared with a fixed setting after a documented tuning change. These numbers describe the same electrical objective comparison. They do not establish an improvement in optical sensitivity or customer throughput.

The test used a physical electrical signal path with software-defined actuation and measurement, one programmed disturbance pattern, and separate passes in a fixed order. The next step is stronger repeated electrical testing, followed by optical validation against an independently calibrated measurement.

The proposed applications include precision metrology, industrial optical inspection, and scientific interferometry. Existing stabilization, detection, and isolation tools already solve important problems. PQS's opportunity is to demonstrate additional value where a controllable quality limitation remains.

For a prospective collaborator, the starting point is a focused evaluation: a clear measurement problem, an accessible adjustment, and a reference that can establish whether the final result improves. Learn more at p q sensing dot com.

Historical concept video

The original visual explainer.

Retained from the earlier PQS site as an introduction to the concept. The current evidence statement supersedes any impression of established optical performance or product readiness.

Loading the player connects to YouTube. Availability and playback depend on that service.

Open the original video on YouTube ↗
Start with the current result.

The June 2026 papers below present concepts and proposed validation paths. They are self-published, not peer-reviewed application benchmarks. Statements about optical, atomic, or quantum systems describe research directions. For supported company performance claims, use the September 2026 evidence page.

Public concept papers
First page of the concept paper
Concept paper / June 2026 / v1.0

Noise-Stationary Locking and Phase-Controlled Dark-Port Injection

The original public explanation of a normalized noise objective, slope-based control, and an auxiliary optical-channel concept.

First page of the concept paper
Concept paper / June 2026 / v1.0

Objective-Function Supervisory Control Modules for Interferometric Measurement Systems

A broader supervisory architecture built around instrument-specific performance objectives.

First page of the concept paper
Concept paper / June 2026 / v1.0

Advanced Supervisory Modules for Atom Interferometric Measurement Systems

Research concepts for matter-wave readout, timing, contrast, and information-related objectives.

EXPLORE

Interactive demonstrations

Compare power, noise, and a normalized objective; then explore recovery of a known code from simulated noise.

Open the demos →
BRING YOUR OWN DATA

Local CSV exploration

Use the sample format in the objective explorer. Measurements stay in your browser and are never uploaded by that tool.

Download example CSV →

Put the right measurement to the test.

Have an instrument with a measurable limitation and an accessible control? Let’s define a focused evaluation.

Discuss an evaluation